Summary

Background Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency worldwide. Concern that delayed treatment might increase perforation can lead to unnecessary surgery and high rates of negative appendicectomy, where a normal, non-inflamed appendix is removed. However, whether perforation is related to pre-hospital time (symptom onset to first surgical assessment) has not been explored in contemporary global data. Methods We conducted an international, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study (AlliGatOr) of patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy for suspected acute appendicitis in 1377 hospitals across 112 countries. We included all consecutive eligible patients and excluded patients undergoing appendicectomy for indications other than suspected acute appendicitis. Each participating hospital entered data from medical records prospectively into the Research Electronic Data Capture platform. The primary outcome was perforation and the primary exposure was pre-hospital time (categorised as <12 h, 12–23 h, 24–47 h, 48–71 h, and ≥72 h). Follow-up was for 30 days after surgery to assess postoperative outcomes. In-hospital time (first surgical assessment to skin incision) was a key secondary exposure. We estimated adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) using multilevel Poisson regression. Multivariable analyses used complete cases; missing data were not imputed. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06774001) and is completed. Findings Between Feb 3 and May 25, 2025, we enrolled 45 218 patients with a median age of 27 years (IQR 18–41); 25 218 (55⋅8%) were male and 19 996 (44⋅2%) were female. 42 317 patients were included in the primary analysis, of whom 13 560 (32⋅0%) had perforation. The adjusted primary model included 41 740 patients with complete covariate data. Access to CT imaging varied across income groups: 12 232 (58⋅6%) of 20 861 patients in high-income countries, 4597 (37⋅1%) of 12 388 in upper-middle-income countries, 1769 (19⋅2%) of 9192 in lower-middle-income countries, and 156 (5⋅6%) of 2769 in low-income countries. Minimally invasive surgery was used in 19 985 (95⋅8%) of 20 861 patients, 6817 (55⋅0%) of 12 390, 2613 (28⋅4%) of 9195, and 203 (7⋅3%) of 2770, respectively. Perforation increased with pre-hospital times, from 2629 (22⋅9%) of 11 487 patients at less than 12 h (reference) to 2671 (25⋅8%) of 10 371 at 12–23 h (aRR 1⋅07 [95% CI 1⋅01–1⋅13]; p=0⋅021), 2969 (33⋅6%) of 8826 at 24–47 h (1⋅36 [1⋅28–1⋅44]; p<0⋅0001), 1933 (41⋅7%) of 4640 at 48–71 h (1⋅62 [1⋅52–1⋅72]; p<0⋅0001), and 3350 (48⋅0%) of 6974 at pre-hospital times of at least 72 h (1⋅85 [1⋅75–1⋅95]; p<0⋅0001). Longer in-hospital time was associated with lower perforation risk: versus less than 12 h, aRRs were 0⋅95 (95% CI 0⋅91–1⋅00; p=0⋅034) for 12–23 h, 0⋅87 (0⋅82–0⋅93; p<0⋅0001) for 24–47 h, and 0⋅82 (0⋅75–0⋅90; p<0⋅0001) for at least 48 h. Perforation was associated with higher complication risk at 30 days (2⋅36 [2⋅24–2⋅48]; p<0⋅0001). Complications were also higher after open surgery than for minimally invasive surgery (1⋅30 [1⋅20–1⋅41]; p<0⋅0001). Negative appendicectomy occurred in 2365 (5⋅2%) of 45 218 patients and was lower among those who had preoperative CT than among those who did not (0⋅69 [0⋅62–0⋅77]; p<0⋅0001). Interpretation These findings support prioritising surgical assessment within 24 h as a target to reduce the burden of perforated appendicitis. Preoperative CT imaging was associated with lower rates of unnecessary operations; access to CT and minimally invasive surgery varied markedly by country income group. Funding National Institute for Health and Care Research.

ABSTRACT

Background: Incisional hernia is a common complication following abdominal surgery, and mesh reinforcement has become

the standard of care. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of sublay versus onlay mesh repair in patients with

incisional her

nia.

Methods: This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at the General Surgery Department, Faculty

of Medicine, ..... Hospitals. A total of 60 patients diagnosed with incisional hernia and scheduled for elective surgical repai

r

were recr

uited from general surgery outpatient clinics and the emergency department. Patients were randomly assigned into

two equal groups: Group A (Onlay Group, n=30) underwent onlay mesh repair, and Group B (Sublay Group, n=30)

underwent sublay (retrorectus) mesh

repair. Baseline demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics were

recorded. Operative parameters, postoperative pain scores (Visual Analogue Scale), hospital stay, return to normal activity,

postoperative complications (seroma, hem

atoma, surgical site infection), and hernia recurrence at 12 months were compared

between the two groups.

Results: Operative time was significantly shorter in the onlay group (88.93 ± 7.93 minutes) compared to the sublay group

(99.67 ± 7.74 minutes) (p < 0.001). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the sublay group at day 1 (4.70 ±

0.76 vs. 6.

10 ± 0.79), 1 week (2.39 ± 0.75 vs. 3.99 ± 0.82), 1 month (0.85 ± 0.74 vs. 2.41 ± 0.88), 3 months (0.30 ± 0.49 vs.

1.41 ± 0.86), 6 months (0.16 ± 0.36 vs. 1.02 ± 0.82), and 12 months (0.14 ± 0.48 vs. 0.82 ± 0.86) (p < 0.001 for all). Hospit

al

stay was sign

ificantly shorter in the sublay group (3.47 ± 1.11 days vs. 4.40 ± 0.93 days, p < 0.001), and return to normal

activity was significantly earlier (21.53 ± 3.41 days vs. 26.07 ± 4.73 days, p < 0.001). No significant difference was found

in drain removal day

(p = 0.257). Postoperative complications including seroma (10.0% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.299), hematoma

(3.3% vs. 6.7%, p = 1.000), and surgical site infection (6.7% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.424) were directionally lower in the sublay

group but did not reach statistical

significance. Hernia recurrence at 12 months was 3.3% in the sublay group versus 10.0%

in the onlay group (p = 0.612). All patients completed the 12

-

month follow

-

up.

Conclusion: Sublay (retrorectus) mesh repair offers significant clinical advantages over onlay mesh repair for incisional

hernia, including superior postoperative pain control, shorter hospital stay, and earlier return to normal activity. Postoper

ative

com

plications and recurrence showed consistent trends favoring sublay repair. These findings support sublay mesh repair as

the preferred technique for elective incisional hernia repair in appropriately selected patients.

.

Keywords

: Incisional hernia, mesh repair, sublay, retrorectus, onlay, postoperative pain, randomized controlled trial.